systemizing being at a high level than empathizing (SNE) is better than charge up in predicating instauration into the physical sciences
compared to humanities. 415 students in both types of discipline (203 males, 212 females) were given questionnaire and
exercise measures of systemizing and empathy. 59.1% of the science students were male and 70.1% of the humanities students
were female. There were significant sex differences on the Empathy Quotient (EQ) (females on average scoring higher) and on the
Systemizing Quotient (SQ) (males on average scoring higher), confirming earlier studies. Scientists also scored higher on the SQ,
and scored lower on the EQ, compared to those in the humanities. Thus, independent of sex, SQ was a significant predictor of entry
into the physical sciences. Results from questionnaire info and performance data indicate an SNE visibility for physical science
students as a group, and an ENS profile for humanities students as a group, regardless of sex.
We interpret this as evidence that
whilst on average males show stronger systemizing and females show stronger empathizing, individuals with a strong systemizing
drive are more likely to enter the physical sciences, irrespective of their sex.
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Sex differences; Cognitive style; Science
Disparities have been noted in the performance of males and females in math and science from an early age
(Geary, Saults, Liu, & Hoard, 2000; Linn & Peterson, 1986). Men also out-number women in careers that claim a
scientific style of thinking (such as engineering), whilst women out-number men in fields that primarily involve social
skills (such as counselling) (Lawrence, 2006). Although there has been an improver in the number of women entering
scientific careers this disparity still exists, and women fill up only 10% of the...If you want to get a blanket(a) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment