application essay

Summing up the explanation of the Civil War, C. Stamp put to the fore the propaganda war waged against each other two sections of the Union. He cites as evidence of this point of view documents: editorials from newspapers, the statements of politicians, subsequent historical works written directly involved in the events. The next group of factors allocated K. Stamp and other scientists, the rise of nationalism and the struggle for "states' rights". If the idea of ​​the growth and development of the southern nationalism is generally accepted, or at least shared by the majority of historians dealing with the history of the South, such as E. Faust [13] and M. Grissom [14], the more difficult is the case with the national identity of the North. Interestingly, in a number of recent studies showing that the North has developed its own national identity, distinct from the South, and in many ways opposite to him. [15] This is in sharp contrast national identities of the North and the South is due now bitter civil war. The modern historian Philip Paludan said that the important thing for a historian to understand why the South seceded not, and why the North has decided to oppose secession. This decision, according to Paludan, was the result of self-identification of the northerners as a democratic and free nation, as well as the result of their intention to maintain "law and order" [16]. If you get more information, visit our site: Write my paper